Creation science radiometric dating
This restriction extends to animals that consume seafood in their diet.As stated previously, carbon dating cannot be used on artifacts over about 50,000 years old.For the past century, a major (but incorrect) assumption underlying all radioactive dating techniques has been that decay rates, which have been essentially constant over the past 100 years, have also been constant over the past 4,600,000,000 years.Unfortunately, few have questioned this huge and critical assumption.Also, many fossils are contaminated with carbon from the environment during collection or preservation procedures.Scientists attempt to check the accuracy of carbon dating by comparing carbon dating data to data from other dating methods. [ The Scientific Case for Creation Radiometric Dating] To date an event or thing that preceded written records, one must assume that the dating clock has operated at a known rate, that the clock’s initial setting is known, and that the clock has not been disturbed. Click here to order the hardbound 8th edition (2008) and other materials.
it's a noble gas and would have diffused out), then dating would be performed on that basis.
Actually, this give supports to the idea of a global flood. See The oldest living thing is younger than 4900 years (Talk.
Origins) Also, since tree rings can grow faster then once a year, tree ring dating might be completely off. Wong’s next rebuttal is to the statement that the original concentration of the materials need to be known. Radiometric dating does not necessarily depend on the assumption that none of the daughter material was originally present.
In reply to the first point, which the Young Earth creationist claims that the decay rate isn't a constant, he claims that...
This is tantamount to claiming that the gravity of the Earth might have been 5 times stronger in medieval times, or that the boiling point of water might have been a thousand degrees a century ago.